We had been collecting publications and public material for a while. There were articles, recordings, feeds, publisher sites and individual contributors. The first temptation was to make a better discovery feed. It was useful, but it left out the people who make the work.

A publication isn't just a list of URLs. It has editors, contributors, a subject, a history and readers who may follow it for years. The person writing an article may also publish elsewhere, host a channel or participate in a local community. A feed card doesn't give any of that much room.

The profile is the beginning §

That's why our public-profile work moved toward person and organization homes. A writer can have posts, collections, publications and relationships. An organization can have its own contributors and channels. A publisher's material can live in a reading room and appear in related topic collections.

The important relationship is that the article still belongs to its original source. A collection or community is a way of finding and discussing it. It does not become the publisher merely because the article appears there.

Different rooms for different work §

Someone discovering a story wants a simple page and a link to its source. Someone researching a subject wants related articles and the people behind them. Someone making a podcast wants recordings, transcripts and permission to reuse material. A community might want to organize a reading group around the same publication.

Those needs suggest a set of connected products: public profiles on Aurekai Life[1], media and channels on Aurekai Live[2], Source Library for retained material and account-owned publishing tools.

The open web has a long history of making this possible through links. ActivityPub[3] is one important standard for connecting social publishing between independent servers. We can learn from that approach while keeping the meaning of a source and the identity of a publisher clear.

We started dogfooding this work with real publication cohorts, reading rooms and community posts. The next step is to make those relationships feel natural to a reader: the story, its author, the publication and the surrounding community should all be easy to find.

Sources and further reading

References point to original material linked in the essay, not independently invented citations.

  1. Aurekai Lifeaurekai.life↩
  2. Aurekai Liveaurekai.live↩
  3. ActivityPubw3.org↩
Across the Journal

Related reading

More articles that explore this subject from another angle.

Browse more articles in the Reading Guide ↗

About this article. Publisher dogfooding and public-profile discussions, October–November 2026. Original analysis prepared for public reading. View editorial source ↗